Which of the following is NOT a method by which groups make decisions?

Disable ads (and more) with a premium pass for a one time $4.99 payment

Master your ASU COM230 Small Group Communication exam with comprehensive study materials. Get access to flashcards, multiple-choice questions, and detailed explanations for better preparation. Score high and achieve success!

Serendipity refers to a fortunate happenstance or accidental discovery, which is not a structured or intentional method for decision-making within a group. In contrast, majority vote, consensus, and compromise are all deliberate processes that groups can use to arrive at a decision.

A majority vote involves members casting their votes on an option, with the option receiving the most votes being selected. This method is common in many democratic settings and is straightforward, allowing for quick decision-making.

Consensus aims for a solution that all group members can agree upon, fostering a collaborative atmosphere where everyone’s input is valued. This method seeks a high level of agreement and cooperation, ensuring that the final decision reflects a collective buy-in.

Compromise involves finding a middle ground where different group members make concessions to reach an agreement. It enables groups to find a solution that, while not ideal for everyone, is acceptable enough to satisfy the majority.

In summary, serendipity does not represent a structured method of decision-making, making it the correct answer for the question regarding methods by which groups make decisions.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy