What outcome is associated with the Compromising conflict management style?

Disable ads (and more) with a premium pass for a one time $4.99 payment

Master your ASU COM230 Small Group Communication exam with comprehensive study materials. Get access to flashcards, multiple-choice questions, and detailed explanations for better preparation. Score high and achieve success!

The Compromising conflict management style is characterized by finding a middle ground where both parties in a conflict make concessions to arrive at a mutually acceptable solution. This style usually leads to a win-win outcome because both sides feel that they have gained something from the negotiation, even if it’s not everything they initially wanted.

In a compromising situation, each participant gives up part of their demands to achieve a common goal or resolution. This approach fosters collaboration and cooperation, as it encourages understanding and the acknowledgement of each other's needs.

The other options do not accurately reflect the nature of the Compromising style. Win-lose solutions indicate a situation where one party benefits at the expense of the other, which contradicts the essence of compromise. Equal distribution of resources implies a fair split without acknowledging the underlying interests of both parties. Finally, high conflict resolution suggests an intense struggle and a resolution process that may not align with the collaborative nature of compromise, where the goal is to ease the conflict rather than escalate it.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy