What is the definition of an ad hominem fallacy?

Disable ads (and more) with a premium pass for a one time $4.99 payment

Master your ASU COM230 Small Group Communication exam with comprehensive study materials. Get access to flashcards, multiple-choice questions, and detailed explanations for better preparation. Score high and achieve success!

An ad hominem fallacy occurs when an argument is rebutted by attacking the character or personal traits of the individual making the argument, rather than addressing the substance of the argument itself. This type of fallacy undermines rational discourse by diverting attention from the actual issue and attempting to discredit someone based on irrelevant personal characteristics. In essence, it seeks to invalidate someone’s position or argument based on who they are, rather than the merit of their ideas. This approach misses the critical goal of engaging meaningfully with the argument being presented, which is essential for constructive debates and discussions.

The other choices do not accurately capture the essence of the ad hominem fallacy. While emotional appeals can mislead arguments, that refers to a different tactic. A logical reasoning process leading to valid conclusions embodies sound reasoning rather than fallacies, and a strategy for enhancing group decision-making does not relate to the fallacious attack mode of argumentation seen in ad hominem cases. Thus, the focus on directly attacking the opponent's character distinguishes this fallacy from the other concepts.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy